I-66
COMMUTER STUDY REGARDING HOV/SHOULDER LANES FROM I-495 TO ROUTE 50
SPONSOR:
Virginia Department of Transportation
Contact: Joan Morris, Office of Public Affairs –
Northern Virginia
Department of
Rail and Public Transportation (drpt@state.va.gov)
Contact: Charlene
(Gus) Robey, TDM and Marketing Section
RESEARCH VENDOR:
Southeastern Institute of Research, Inc., Richmond,
VA. Conducted: 1993
Contact: John W. Martin
Telephone: 804-358-8981
Email: JWM@SIRresearch.com
OVERALL PURPOSE:
This research was designed to assess perceived operational
safety of newly implemented HOV/shoulder lanes that were being used in rush
hour. This research led to the
development and installation of appropriate signage – resulting in more
successful usage of the HOV lanes.
Objectives of
Research:
Determine commuters’ attitudes and perceptions of
HOV/shoulder lanes from I-495 to Route 50 in regard to:
-
Road safety
-
Shoulder lane usage
-
Signage
-
Shoulder lane violators
-
Possible strategies to improve road safety and shoulder
lane compliance
METHODOLOGY:
|
Mode of Data Collection |
Telephone survey |
|
Completed Interviews |
250 |
|
Survey Population |
Northern Virginia households containing a workday
commuter on I-66 |
|
Survey Instrument |
Questionnaire administered by telephone interviewers |
|
Criteria for Participation |
Northern Virginia residents who commute at least 25
minutes one-way to work and travel through or to Fairfax County via
I-66. |
SELECTED KEY FINDINGS:
Overall,
most commuters perceive the 8-mile stretch of I-66 to be safe. In comparison with other major highways in
the area, about one-fifth felt I-66 between the Capitol Beltway and Route 50
during rush hour was “more safe” while 48% felt it was as safe as other major
highways. One-third (33%) believed it
was “less safe.” Eight percent (8%)
were “unsure.”
Most
commuters understood shoulder lane restrictions. A very high percentage of commuters said the red “X” indicates
“the lane is closed to traffic” (93%) and 6% said it indicates “emergency
stopping only.”
A
sizeable group of commuters did not know what the penalty was for using the
shoulder lane illegally. Nearly 2 out
of 3 commuters (65%) were aware that driving in the shoulder lane illegally was
a moving violation punishable by a $44 fine and up to 3 points on their driving
record, but 34% were not aware of the penalty.
Commuters
speculated that people were motivated to drive in the shoulder lane when they
were not supposed to – “mainly to exit I-66 sooner than signs/pavement markers
indicated” (67%) and “because there was little chance they would be stopped and
ticketed” (71%).
By an
overwhelming margin, the ultimate responsibility for the safety of those using
the shoulder lane is believed to rest with the driver (92%).
Two-thirds
of commuters (68%) were aware that the restriction for using the HOV lanes on
I-66 would be raised from 2 to 3 people once the existing HOV lanes became
crowded.
Commuters
were aware of and understood how electronic line markers work.
OTHER FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Commuters
felt that the following four suggestions put forth to reduce HOV/shoulder lane
violations and improve the overall safety on the 8-mile stretch of I-66 between
the Capitol Beltway and Route 50 would be most helpful:
“Installing reflective pavement markers and stripes to
indicate where drivers could enter the shoulder and begin exiting I-66” (84%)
“More vigorous enforcement of HOV violators by the state
police and courts” (84%)
“More vigorous enforcement of shoulder lane violators by
the state police and courts” (81%)
“Making information available on how to use I-66 on the
8-mile stretch for all commuters via direct mail, newspapers, announcements,
etc.” (73%)
AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS:
|
Data Tables |
KEY WORDS:
HOV lanes, information, safety, shoulder lanes, signage